Without a comprehensive succession plan in place, organizations leave themselves open to several risks. One of the biggest risks is a disruption in organizational performance. A lack of succession planning could also lead to top talent turnover and retention issues.
Let's dive deeper into these risks and explore some real-world examples.
1. Leadership Gaps Disrupt Performance
Although critical, succession planning can be viewed as a daunting task. One Korn Ferry study showed that 87% of companies felt ill-equipped to handle executive transitions. Unfortunately, a lack of preparation often results in delayed decisions, operational slowdowns, and lost momentum.
Apple’s transition from Steve Jobs to Tim Cook worked seamlessly because the company spent years preparing. Jobs had mentored Cook for more than a decade, gradually shifting key responsibilities to him.
Apple’s board was aligned and communicated the transition clearly, which gave stakeholders confidence and preserved market stability. Cook’s leadership style was known internally, ensuring minimal disruption during the handover. Here, Jobs’ long-term succession plan ensured the company didn’t miss a beat—even without him at the helm.
In contrast, Mattel’s CEO exit in 2015 revealed a glaring lack of preparedness. Bryan Stockton resigned abruptly after poor financial performance, leaving a leadership vacuum and a demoralized workforce.
Mattel did not have a clear successor in place, and the board had to scramble to find interim leadership. This sudden shift and lack of a robust succession plan ultimately led to confusion, lower investor confidence, and stalled momentum.
2. Retention Challenges and Talent Drain
Top performers want to see a future for themselves. If leadership development pathways are unclear, high-potential employees may look elsewhere. Transparency and internal mobility are key to retention.
At LinkedIn, a strong focus on internal mobility has allowed employees to grow into leadership roles over time. The company's "Tour of Duty" model encourages employees to define their growth trajectory within the organization, which boosts retention and engagement. This structured career pathing shows talent that there is a future for them inside the organization, not outside it.
Contrast that with Yahoo’s situation during its leadership turbulence. With a revolving door of CEOs and little continuity in strategic direction, top talent grew increasingly disillusioned.
The company experienced frequent turnover, particularly in product and engineering leadership, which contributed to its stagnation and eventual acquisition by Verizon. The absence of visible development paths and internal promotion opportunities accelerated Yahoo’s decline as a home for talented professionals.
More Real-World Lessons on the Importance of Succession Planning (and What Happens When You Ignore It)
As you can see, succession planning is mission-critical to an organization's preservation and survival throughout the years. Here are a few more real-world examples of succession planning wins and losses.
Success Stories:
- Procter & Gamble is known for promoting from within, guided by its Global Leadership Council. When CEO A.G. Lafley returned in 2013 to replace Bob McDonald, it was a smooth, strategic move backed by a deep internal bench. Their long-term approach prioritizes continuity, cultural fit, and readiness.
- McDonald’s succession model emphasizes internal mobility. Don Thompson, a 20-year veteran, succeeded Jim Skinner in 2012. His familiarity with the business enabled a quick, low-friction transition, proof of the company’s strong internal pipeline.
Cautionary Tales:
- Jack Welch built a celebrated succession system at GE, but it fell apart when Jeff Immelt took over. Strategic missteps, weak board oversight, and a heavy reliance on past momentum caught up with the company. Even with a well-documented succession planning process in place, execution and adaptability were lacking.
- In 2012, the board at the University of Virginia abruptly removed President Teresa Sullivan without a clear plan or stakeholder input. The backlash was swift, forcing her reinstatement. The episode underscores how poor communication and lack of succession alignment can destabilize even respected institutions.
Now that we've reviewed real-life succession planning wins and the consequences of falling behind, let's take a look at what leaders can do to maximize their success.
Your Succession Planning Playbook: A Practical Framework
If you're new to succession planning or looking to strengthen your current approach, this step-by-step framework provides a clear starting point. These core actions can help build leadership depth and ensure long-term continuity.
- Identify Critical Positions. Focus on roles that drive value creation and operational stability. Think beyond the C-suite.
- Audit Your Talent Pool. Use performance data and potential assessments to spot high-potential team members early.
- Invest in Development. Offer coaching, stretch roles, and cross-functional projects. Develop soft skills and strategic thinking.
- Create Emergency Plans. Prepare interim leadership structures for sudden exits and unplanned events.
- Align Across Leadership. Ensure leadership buy-in. Keep your board, HR, and executive team in sync.
- Review Regularly. Succession planning should evolve with business strategy, talent movement, and market trends.
Even modest efforts in these areas can have a meaningful impact. The key is consistency. Succession planning should be an ongoing process, not a one-time project.
Unleashing the Potential of Your Organization
Succession planning is more than just naming names. It's about building a process that prepares your business for whatever comes next. From boosting morale and retaining top talent to safeguarding continuity, it's one of the smartest investments a leadership team can make.
Looking for more support around developing your organization's succession plan? Connect with us or consider attending one of our upcoming leadership events.